“When you
wait you start feeling deserved.”
There is a
personal story etched into this book. And it contains me, Zusak and the Dunbar
family.
The core
theme that cuts across everything is patience. Patience for forgiveness, for
clarity and above all – for each other.
In the midst
of all this is Clay Dunbar and the bridge that was to be made.
But I am
getting ahead of myself. With the Book Thief, Zusak managed to create a space
in my heart for his work – and that culminated in me going for my first ever
author meetup with like-minded friends in the city.
It was an
experience.
I heard him
mention his struggles writing this book – almost his magnum opus in a sense
that requires hindsight after a long career. And the celebration that it is
finally here, in completion.
When you
take the core idea of the book, to show how family can survive adversity – it’s
a noble one. And done right it can elevate something cookie cutter to a truly
transformational experience. Given the author brings in certain
autobiographical elements of his own life, it takes an existence of its own
through induction of both the old and the new.
And it’s
wonderfully rich in characters, especially the absent but not truly gone Peggy
Dunbar.
Her story of
success and failure and the legacy she leaves behind for her children is
beautifully tragic, and it’s something that makes Clay, who is otherwise a bit
bland, into the catalyst for this novel’s progression.
But it’s
Clay who proves the most difficult to care for. Stripped of any agency, Zusak
fails to render him as more than plot device, even when it comes to personal
stakes near the end of the novel. He almost seems like an abstract, an idea
that other characters including the narrator get to play around with to reach
from one point to another.
It’s sad
that despite having such a rich cast, the author fails to create a sense of
world building that doesn’t feel hemmed in or breaking the flow of the novel.
Creating something this vast is impressive, but just like a poorly constructed
bridge – it will only be on show as a spectacle till the time an oppressive
element comes along and destroys it completely.
And that is
what gets this novel into problematic avenues. As a one page idea, it’s golden.
But the more and more it delves into the plot at the expense of it’s
characters, prioritizing the wrong ones (which is something I heard cause him
confusion as well during the writing phase) and hiding the truly golden eggs –
it creates an experience that leaves one more aghast with what has been lost
than what was gained.
By the end,
everyone is successful through with bittersweet memories. All’s well that end’s
well?
Not quite.
So, I give
it 4 out of 10.
+A rich cast
+Brilliant
themes explored
-The
protagonist is bland and underdeveloped
-Some
characters feel overexposed while others are underexposed
-The ending
is convoluted with no real build up
-The flow of
the novel breaks up too often
No comments:
Post a Comment