Life, whatever
else it might be, is not reasonable.
And so
starts an intriguing tale of mystery as we see a heiress on the stand for
murder – with all fingers pointed at her save one voice that asks Poirot to
save her.
As usual, Christie
gives just enough of a clue to let you in on the secret, but in the end just
like the murderer, Poirot foils you with his clever touch. It’s an interesting
framing choice to make Poirot fit into the narrative rather than him setting it
– we start off in the courtroom, the case is set against the accused and then
Poirot must cross question all of the stakeholders to find what is true and
what is not.
This ensures
we get a clear bird’s eye view into opinions, and that is where Poirot hunts,
for the lapses in words. As he mentions, the lies often tell more than the truth.
It’s hard to
not spoil the resolution, where I do have a slight concern, if we discuss it
but we get a wonderful idea of how love especially plays into the aristocratic
lifestyle – and how much damaging it can be to people involved.
While I am
intrigued by the framing device used, I felt it was a bit restrictive and monotonous
as if reading a case file. Obviously, Poirot’s presence ensures the story never
lacks that glint of witty repertoire through our favourite moustached detective,
but the characters themselves fail to hold our attention.
While I wasn’t
a proper fan of the resolution, I still loved how he tied it to the core theme
of lies being the true power centers of a detective’s investigation – and the
tragedy of a person caught in a game beyond her understanding.
So, I give
it a 6.5 out of 10.
+Poirot is a
beast of epic detective proportions here
+The English aristocratic setting is intriguing
+Themes were worthy to ponder on
+The English aristocratic setting is intriguing
+Themes were worthy to ponder on
-The resolution
felt a bit contrived
-The flow of the book became too rigid, as if reading a case book
No comments:
Post a Comment