Reflecting back on 2013, a year of polarizing superhero movies, Man of Steel stood
out as the most extreme of them all.
Not only was it a new Superman film after a long absence (I will not count
Superman Returns. Will. Not.) from the big screen, it is heralding what may be
an ambitious project to create a DC cinematic universe.
As with such movies, there were many great and bad moments
in this film. Having seen the movie in theaters thrice (all times in 3D) and
bought the BluRay, I will give my thoughts on it….
(SPOILERS FOLLOW)
EVERYTHING RIGHT……………
1. The costume
It helps in making you believe that you’re actually watching Superman, and not
some pretender (‘cough’ Superman Returns 'cough’).
While it's origins are still suspect (they should have said something like the ship has an AI threading device or something...), it looks great. The contrasting shades as well as Henry Cavill looking like Superman in it all helps.
Whether in flight, battle or the calm moments, it all looks like it's the Man of Steel.
Whether in flight, battle or the calm moments, it all looks like it's the Man of Steel.
2. The visual effects
Never have before a movie felt like a comic book come alive.
Krypton was actually shown to be an alien planet inhabited by strange creatures and
formations, unique in it's own way.
The battles in Smallville and Metropolis came straight
out of a comic book and were brilliantly choreographed.
3. Lois Lane
She’s intuitive, smart and resourceful. I never bought how
she was so easily fooled by Clark’s elaborate excuses and this film addresses
it by making her a part of Clark’s and Superman’s life without compromising on
her character.
The fact that Zod recognized this and brought her onboard as a safety measure and bargaining chip against Clark, and which ultimately backfired, was a great plot point.
4. General Zod
Most people failed to see Zod for who he was. He wasn’t a
supervillain bent on controlling an alien world only to be thwarted by the hero. He was just a man trying to
save his race and Shannon portrayed that beautifully.
Yes, his plans were corrupted by his hatred of Jor-El and
his son, making Earth the focus of his rage. The fact that he was willing to
forgo the powers Earth’s unique environment gave him so that adaptation to this
planet would be easier for the rest of his race was commendable. Instead of
everyone needing protective suits and military training, the Kryptonians would
be able to live normally.
Also, special mention to Antje Traue as Faora. She owned every scene she was in and is hopefully a template for how they show Diana aka Wonder Woman.
5. The realistic responses
Jonathan Kent’s fears of losing his son to oppressive and
dangerous forces are very relatable and true. Pa Kent is just a man, not
anything more, and it’s clear how much he loves Clark.
His warnings to Clark may not have always been
the best, but it was real.
Perry’s fears of alien exposure on the world leading to mass
hysteria are also a good example. Everything isn’t perfect with the world, and
the metaphorical threat of something more advanced than ourselves is
frightening. As was the mining of resources leading to Krypton’s demise, a
subtext for our blatant misuse of Earth.
Clark’s development of his
Earthy given powers was also deftly shown. While the closet scene could have
been better handled (the trailer portion was excellent!), his fear and start of
his control was done carefully and not as a ‘look, I got powers!’
As for the Kryptonians, their use of adaptive suits was a
good device to par them with Clark on a power
level reaching him. Zod being able to adapt after a brief stint in the suit
followed by using his military training to control his newfound abilities was
also well done.
EVERYTHING WRONG………….
1. Sub-par leading man
While Henry Cavill looked the part, he failed to elicit any
of the acting chops that would have helped us understand him. Whether it was
happiness, sadness or agony, Henry failed in every acting department, making
him a very bland lead.
2. No balance of light and dark
This was a dreary film. Instead of contrasting shades, Clark
and the rest always felt like they were fighting a losing battle thanks to the
film contours.
This works with Batman because of the world he inhibits, but for
Clark and Metropolis, the brief light at the
end wasn’t enough.
3. Some horrible contrived circumstances
Pa Kent’s death falls in this category. I would have
understood Clark being too late to save his
adoptive father, but the series of events that led to this death felt forced
and the emotional resonance was lost. The philosophy of hiding his powers also
was understandable, but Jonathan Kent came off more as a man with a death wish
than a protective father.
Lois’ involvement was also suspect. Her presence in the cave
when Clark found the ship and when Zod was
killed at the end all felt forced. Also while I loved Russell Crowe as Jor-El,
his prominent presence and involvement in saving the Earth lessened his death.
4. Heroic qualities missing
Clark started off well on
the path of a hero with the bus accident, but the Metropolis battle had one
detrimental effect to it. We didn’t see Superman save people. I think Clark’s position of helplessness and the film’s
conclusion would have had better effect if we had seen him saving some
bystanders, maybe failing in most cases.
5. No reflective scenarios
While I fully understand Superman’s situational agony in
killing the last of his race to save his adoptive one, a prolonged reflection
of his actions was needed (something I hope is done in the sequel).
He not only participated in the destruction of Metropolis
and Smallville, he was an unwitting cause of the attack and had to commit
murder at the end. Yet after that moment, we are treated to a flippant scene
and then fast-forward to a healing Metropolis and Clark’s
first day on the job at Daily Planet. The shift is jarring and rushed.
CONCLUSION…..
While visually it is the best superhero film I’ve seen and
includes some great performances and plot points, there are some heavy flaws in
those departments as well.
I’m hoping Snyder’s team can rectify the flaws and
give us an awesome sequel.
Onward Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice!
Please do an analysis of 'Iron Man' trilogy.
ReplyDeleteI will consider it.
DeleteEspecially as it fell off the rails after the first film, which is a rarity. The second one being the peak seems to be more a rule (Winter Soldier, Dark Knight, X-Men 2, Spider-Man 2) than an exception, and the IM trilogy was that exception.